Single-Point & Multi-Point Blower Door Tests

  • Single-Point Test (CF3R‑ENV‑20a): Measures air leakage at a single pressure ā‰ˆ50 Pa to report ACH50 for compliance documentation.Ā 

  • Multi-Point Test (CF3R‑ENV‑20b): Records airflow at several pressures to generate a curve, offering greater accuracy and insight into envelope performance. Required for high-performance buildings or tight thresholds.

Total System Air Flow Test

Field verification of HVAC airflow is required:

  • Minimum 350 CFM/ton for new systems, or 300 CFM/ton for altered systems.

  • Flow is measured via static pressure probes or certified airflow meter.

Plenum Pressure Matching

  • Pressure-probe-based tests compare static pressure inside and outside the plenum to assess airflow and leakage points.

  • Effective for commissioning balanced systems or exhaust shafts; especially common in multifamily layouts under Title 24.

Using Duct Tester or Blower Door as Powered Flow Hood

  • Appliances like DucTester or blower-door fans can double as flow hoods when placed at return inlet.

  • With DM‑32 gauge, this setup directly reports supply fan flow—eliminating the need for separate airflow tools.
    (Suggested in video context)

  • The TrueFlowĀ® meter from Energy Conservatory is Title 24-approved for airflow verification; it’s certified and listed by the California Energy Commission.

Leakage to Outside — California-Specific Method

Title 24 allows two options to determine duct leakage to the outdoors:

  1. Percentage of total fan flow: Leakage must be ≤10% of total airflow. Alternatively:

  2. Percentage of system airflow: Total duct leakage must be ≤15%. Test pressures used are ±25 Pa.

These options give flexibility in meeting Title 24 compliance depending on installation type (new vs altered systems).

Why It Matters

  • Universally applicable: Even in non-CA jurisdictions, blower-door testing, airflow verification, and duct leakage to outside are best practices aligned with IECC and ASHRAE standards.

  • Flexible methods: Whether you choose system-based airflow or percentage leakage methods, the results are compliant and defensible.

  • Certified tools: Using approved meters (TrueFlow, DM‑32) ensures test data is valid under state or program audit.

  • Commissioning synergy: Combining envelope testing, HVAC airflow, and duct leakage in one workflow increases test efficiency and reveals system-wide issues early.

Summary Table

Test MethodPurposeProtocol / StandardCompliance Target
Single vs Multi‑PointEnvelope leakage measurementCF3R‑ENV‑20a (single) or ENV‑20b (multi)ACH50 per certificate
Airflow TestHVAC flow validationStatic probe or TrueFlow; ≄300/350 CFM/tonCode minimum airflow
Plenum Pressure MatchingSystem balancing and leak locationProbe-based comparison of plenum pressuresUsed in multifamily/Title 24
Powered Flow HoodFan airflow from return sideDucTester / blower-door + DM-32Inline validation
Leakage-to-OutsideDuct leakage quantification≤10% or ≤15% of fan flow at ±25 PaTitle 24 HERS threshold
Share this story: